@Nearshore_Tim @TrevorABranch @kimfriedmans @ScienceMagazine Agree that we should try and converge opposing discourses but there are some underlying divergences that are still presenting challenges, as discussed here many years ago but again becoming very
@TaotaoTasi Couldn't agree more, related perspectives discussed and analysed in this paper that may be of interest #OpenAccess https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor
@Nephropseu @YourFishingNews #OpenAccess paper that explores different perspectives on the roles that sustainable use and set-aside for conservation should play in seascape management https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor https://t.co/zcdWTvAk3X
@Nephropseu @YourFishingNews That's one dimension of a complex argument on which there are others. Marine equivalent of #landsharing (sustainable farming across the landscape) or #landsparing (some areas for farming, some for conservation, some both: what
@DrTonyBicknell @Macomabalthica @jskawe @BD_Stew @SustainFishUW One reason is so that the findings of such studies can be used by fishing industry & some less than impartial fisheries scientists as 'evidence' that impacts of demersal trawling are minim
@kimfriedmans It's interesting that FAO & related fisheries scientists continue to argue that fisheries management yields better outcomes at a landscape (oceanscape) scale, implicitly & sometimes explicitly still arguing against the need for MPAs/m
@SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging storylin
@SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter @NEF Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging sto
@SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging storylin
@SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter @NEF Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging sto
@SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging storylin
@SustainFishUW Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging storylines, also disc
@SustainFishUW Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging storylines, also disc
@SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter Values "reflection of differing ethical perspectives, no-take MPA proponents being more influenced by preservationist/ecocentric perspectives, & conventional fisheries management proponents more influenced by utilitarian res
RT @PJSJones: @SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter @NEF Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspect…
@SustainFishUW @gwcarpenter @NEF Excellent blog. Value divergences behind many fisheries & biodiversity conservation perspectives, ie. between utilitarian & ecocentric/preservationist priorities, reflected in language used and part of diverging sto
@MJBurgass @Macomabalthica @Searica_ITG @OceanaEurope @EU_MARE Couldn't agree more, see paper below for discussion of different but potentially complementary objectives of MPAs & fisheries management. If we think of the two as being in complementary co
@Macomabalthica @Searica_ITG @OceanaEurope @EU_MARE By this dubious rationale is fisheries management not also a tool to achieve fisheries conservation objectives, ie. a framework for achieving these objectives? So MPAs are similarly a framework for achiev
RT @PJSJones: @AshaMcNeill Try this paper, Asha, looks at various differences between fisheries scientists and ecologists in relation to MP…
@AshaMcNeill Try this paper, Asha, looks at various differences between fisheries scientists and ecologists in relation to MPA debates, including ideological divide https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor
@cakebreadillust @Macomabalthica - @BD_Stew is not of this fisheries crew, have cited @micheljkaiser at least once https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor
@ConversationEDU Clue's in title: marine parks AND fisheries management. Critique of article https://t.co/9AUdz7gJcR https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor
@ChristopherWr11 @CoralCoE @ConversationEDU Clue is in title: marine parks AND fisheries management: false dichotomy https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor
@MarkMr7harmoni @HoboSci @BD_Stew More to healthy seas than sustainably harvested fish stocks, MPAs part of mix https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor
RT @PJSJones: @HoboSci Quicker link to published open access paper https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor
@HoboSci Quicker link to published open access paper https://t.co/Cv0I87UXor