↓ Skip to main content

Platelet transfusions in cancer patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Platelet transfusions in cancer patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13613-015-0088-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bassem Habr, Julien Charpentier, Benoît Champigneulle, Agnès Dechartres, Fabrice Daviaud, Guillaume Geri, Alain Cariou, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Jean-Paul Mira, Frédéric Pène

Abstract

Thrombocytopenia is a frequent finding in critically ill cancer patients for whom indications of platelet transfusions are unclear. We herein addressed the current practices in platelet transfusion and the risk of bleeding in cancer patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit (ICU). A retrospective monocenter study over a 7-year period was conducted in a medical ICU. Adult patients with malignancies and hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia, and who received at least one platelet concentrate during their ICU stay, were included. 296 patients were included and received a total of 904 platelet transfusions, for prophylactic indications in 300 (33.2 %) episodes, for securing an invasive procedure in 257 (28.4 %), and for treatment of minor to major bleeding manifestations in 347 (38.4 %). Most prophylactic transfusions (80 %) were performed at platelet count thresholds below 10-20 × 10(9)/L. Platelet increments were generally low in all three indications, 10 (interquartile range 2-25), 11 (2-25), and 8 (0-21) × 10(9)/L, respectively. A total of 97 major ICU-acquired bleeding events occurred in 40 patients. About half of those bleeding episodes (54.7 %) occurred at platelet counts below 20 × 10(9)/L. However, neither low admission platelet count nor low nadir platelet counts were predictive of ICU-acquired bleeding. The in-ICU mortality rate tended to be higher in patients with severe ICU-acquired bleeding events (50 vs. 36 %). Most prophylactic platelet transfusions were given using thresholds of 10-20 × 10(9)/L in critically ill thrombocytopenic cancer patients. The individual risk of ICU-acquired severe bleeding appears hardly predictable with the depth of thrombocytopenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,297,343
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#956
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,860
of 387,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.