↓ Skip to main content

At What Scales and Why Does Forest Structure Vary in Naturally Dynamic Boreal Forests? An Analysis of Forest Landscapes on Two Continents

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
At What Scales and Why Does Forest Structure Vary in Naturally Dynamic Boreal Forests? An Analysis of Forest Landscapes on Two Continents
Published in
Ecosystems, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10021-018-0297-2
Authors

Niko Kulha, Leena Pasanen, Lasse Holmström, Louis De Grandpré, Timo Kuuluvainen, Tuomas Aakala

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Unspecified 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 25%
Unspecified 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,068,737
of 13,511,578 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#277
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,172
of 264,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,511,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.