↓ Skip to main content

Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
139 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13089-018-0104-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirko Zanatta, Piero Benato, Sigilfredo De Battisti, Concetta Pirozzi, Renato Ippolito, Vito Cianci

Abstract

Pre-hospital ultrasound is a new challenge and lung ultrasound could be an interesting opportunity in the pre-hospital medical service. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital non-traumatic respiratory insufficiency. We planned a case-controlled study in the ULSS 5 ovest vicentino area (Vicenza-Italy) enrolling subjects with severe dyspnea caused by cardiac heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We compared drugs administration, oxygen delivery, and laboratory tests between those patients with ultrasound integrated management and those without ultrasound. Pre-hospital lung ultrasound had a high specificity (94.4%) and sensitivity (100%) for the correct identification of alveolar interstitial syndrome using B lines, whereas the percentages obtained with pleural effusion were lower (83.3, 53.3%, respectively). The patients with ultrasound integrated management received a more appropriate pharmacological therapy (p 0.01), as well as non-invasive ventilation (CPAP) was used more frequently in those with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p 0.011). Laboratory tests and blood gases analysis were not significant different between the two study groups. In a sub-analysis of the patients with an A profile, we observed a significant lower concentration of PCO2 in those with an ultrasound integrated management (PCO2: 42.62 vs 52.23 p 0.049). According with physicians' opinion, pre-hospital lung ultrasound gave important information or changed the therapy in the 42.3% of cases, whereas it just confirmed physical examination in the 67.7% of cases. Pre-hospital lung ultrasound is easy and feasible, and learning curve is rapid. Our study suggests that cardiac heart failure and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be considered two indications for pre-hospital ultrasound, and can improve the management of patient with acute respiratory insufficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 38%