↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, January 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1012602911339
Authors

G.J. Monteny, C.M. Groenestein, M.A. Hilhorst

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 31%
Engineering 9 13%
Unspecified 5 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Other 6 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2006.
All research outputs
#3,308,673
of 11,724,470 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#58
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,179
of 117,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,724,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them