↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Journal of Community Health, January 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1010303528081
Authors

Daniel D. Silverstein, Allen D. Spiegel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Unspecified 6 16%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 35%
Unspecified 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Psychology 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Other 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#10,919,600
of 13,737,312 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#683
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,674
of 358,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,737,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.