↓ Skip to main content

A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes

Overview of attention for article published in Surveys in Geophysics, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes
Published in
Surveys in Geophysics, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y
Authors

John Douglas, Hideo Aochi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Greece 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 151 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 28%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 20 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 67 42%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 27%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,468,944
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#114
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,173
of 90,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.