↓ Skip to main content

A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes

Overview of attention for article published in Surveys in Geophysics, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 118)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes
Published in
Surveys in Geophysics, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y
Authors

John Douglas, Hideo Aochi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Slovakia 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Greece 1 3%
Unknown 31 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Student > Master 8 22%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 46%
Engineering 15 41%
Computer Science 3 8%
Unspecified 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,256,414
of 8,647,833 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#44
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,678
of 228,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,647,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.