| Title |
Moral experiences of humanitarian health professionals caring for patients who are dying or likely to die in a humanitarian crisis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-018-0040-9 |
| Authors |
Matthew Hunt, Ani Chénier, Kevin Bezanson, Elysée Nouvet, Carrie Bernard, Sonya de Laat, Gautham Krishnaraj, Lisa Schwartz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#791,916
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#14
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,017
of 341,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.