| Title |
Identification and pathogenicity assessment of Colletotrichum isolates causing bitter rot of apple fruit in Belgium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-018-1539-z |
| Authors |
Amelie Grammen, M. Wenneker, J. Van Campenhout, K. T. K. Pham, W. Van Hemelrijck, D. Bylemans, A. Geeraerd, W. Keulemans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,945,052
of 23,917,076 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#324
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,822
of 334,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.