| Title |
The contribution of mitochondrial function to reproductive aging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10815-011-9588-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaakov Bentov, Tetyana Yavorska, Navid Esfandiari, Andrea Jurisicova, Robert F. Casper |
| Abstract |
The number of women attempting to conceive between the ages of 36 and 44 has increased significantly in the last decade. While it is well established that women's reproductive success dramatically declines with age, the underlying physiological changes responsible for this phenomenon are not well understood. With assisted reproductive technologies, it is clear that oocyte quality is a likely cause since women over 40 undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with oocytes donated by younger women have success rates comparable to young patients. Apart from oocyte donation, there is no known intervention to improve the pregnancy outcome of older patients. The aim of this paper was the review the relevant data on the potential role of mitochondria in reproductive aging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 86% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,539,649
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#69
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,353
of 114,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them