↓ Skip to main content

The Role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for Interactive Proof Development in Mizar

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Automated Reasoning, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
The Role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for Interactive Proof Development in Mizar
Published in
Journal of Automated Reasoning, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10817-017-9440-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, Karol Pąk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 75%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,377,821
of 11,845,571 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#40
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,904
of 190,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,845,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them