RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Noone is really out there to show research is all wrong, and less of all John Ioannidis. For instance, in a paper we co…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Noone is really out there to show research is all wrong, and less of all John Ioannidis. For instance, in a paper we co…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Noone is really out there to show research is all wrong, and less of all John Ioannidis. For instance, in a paper we co…
Noone is really out there to show research is all wrong, and less of all John Ioannidis. For instance, in a paper we co-authored we had no "psychological COI" to report the absence of differences between industry-funded vs non-funded trials. 5/ https://t.c
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
Industry-funded RCTs are the minority in intensive care. We found no evidence that industry-funded trials in intensive care yield more favorable results or are less likely to reach unfavorable conclusions. https://t.co/YwVpJgvx8h
Ensayos clínicos en cuidados intensivos. Poquísimos patrocinados por las industrias pero esos pocos no están sesgados a favor de. https://t.co/YwVpJgvx8h
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
RT @METRICStanford: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @…
Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview. By Perrine Janiaud, @IoanaA_Cristea and John Ioannidis https://t.co/Kj56aIvNoA
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Our new article @METRICStanford led by Perrine Janiaud & John Ioannidis @yourICM "Industry-funded versus non-profit-fun…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Our new article @METRICStanford led by Perrine Janiaud & John Ioannidis @yourICM "Industry-funded versus non-profit-fun…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Our new article @METRICStanford led by Perrine Janiaud & John Ioannidis @yourICM "Industry-funded versus non-profit-fun…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Our new article @METRICStanford led by Perrine Janiaud & John Ioannidis @yourICM "Industry-funded versus non-profit-fun…
Un domeniu în care finanțarea din partea industriei nu distorsionează rezultatele.
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Our new article @METRICStanford led by Perrine Janiaud & John Ioannidis @yourICM "Industry-funded versus non-profit-fun…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
RT @hildabast: No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with m…
No industry funding bias found in randomized trials in intensive care: study of 568 trials from 67 systematic reviews with meta-analyses https://t.co/MKztByXj34 (All but 1 topic had trials that weren't industry-funded) HT @IoanaA_Cristea (ROR = ratio of od
Our new article @METRICStanford led by Perrine Janiaud & John Ioannidis @yourICM "Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded #criticalcare research: a meta-epidemiological overview" #Intensivecare https://t.co/I4U9e4B6hw
RT @AndersPerner: Industry funded RCTs in critical care are few and results not obviously biased https://t.co/reoO5uHN7L
RT @f_g_zampieri: This is awesome https://t.co/GShzgWD3zC
RT @critcarecardiol: Reassuring that public funding of RCTs in the #ICU achieve similar rates of 'success'; however, industry collaboration…
Reassuring that public funding of RCTs in the #ICU achieve similar rates of 'success'; however, industry collaborations still necessary to get some trials off the ground. Research in some challenge areas still underfunded by public means! @yourICM
This is awesome
Industry funded RCTs in critical care are few and results not obviously biased
Do we need more industry-funded #RCTs in intensive care? Meta-epidemiological overview by Prof. John Iioannidis et al. Full text available for free at https://t.co/1wBf54Xz0Q. https://t.co/8C42JLKIOo
RT @lasecip: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview https://t.co/J2WNyv3lYL #IntC…
I am always suspicious of pharma industry sponsored studies (esp pharmacoeconomic ones) but this analysis of 568 RCTs in critical care settings suggests that my concerns may be unfounded. Does not change my view though! https://t.co/hwohSg7jl4 #haemophilia
Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview https://t.co/J2WNyv3lYL #IntCareMed