| Title |
Sleep quality in mechanically ventilated patients: comparison between NAVA and PSV modes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-1-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stéphane Delisle, Paul Ouellet, Patrick Bellemare, Jean-Pierre Tétrault, Pierre Arsenault |
| Abstract |
Mechanical ventilation seems to occupy a major source in alteration in the quality and quantity of sleep among patients in intensive care. Quality of sleep is negatively affected with frequent patient-ventilator asynchronies and more specifically with modes of ventilation. The quality of sleep among ventilated patients seems to be related in part to the alteration between the capacities of the ventilator to meet patient demand. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of two modes of ventilation and patient-ventilator interaction on sleep architecture. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#814
of 1,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,456
of 131,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.