Michael Huemer janti bir abimiz... https://t.co/2BdSi6qMCf
@NicoVanDerWiel @JRockMcGrizzle @CapturingChrist No, I think it's perfectly fine and that if someone wants something better, they will have to read. Videos like this aren't optimal for all things. So here's this: https://t.co/49BvPftKw3 https://t.co/YJnVL
@IvesParrhesia Such as this: https://t.co/Tsjclh0Zyh But we can bring naturalistic explanations about moral progress too. But I concede that it's more probable that "It's wrong to torture babies" than "It's right to torture babies."
@AStrasser116 Yeah, I think moral progress can be at least some evidence for theism because under atheism you would probably expect morality to be based on the debunking explanations for morality. Like evolution, culture, etc. https://t.co/55rGTamBD4
@NecessaryBeing @veganbyuatheist Whoops I realized I didn't reply in the chat, yes Huemer did offer a moral progress argument. This is the one I'm thinking of https://t.co/xOwLnOkdXx Looking back at my folder, there's been quite a bit of discussion on mora
@David_Boaz @tomgpalmer Michael Huemer's take on moral progress and moral realism is also worth reading: https://t.co/aOQeyKmwvG From the abstract: „humanity is becoming increasingly liberal because liberalism is the objectively correct moral stance.“
Liberalism may have been on the upswing until late last century. It no longer is. Today, those who believe in freedom are fighting a rear-guard action against tyranny and its anti-philosophies.
"Humanity is becoming increasingly liberal because liberalism is the objectively correct moral stance." Huemer: https://t.co/hsqjBAgaFF
RT @sgerst: Zis moment when you go through the latest issue of Philosophical Studies and suddenly Mike Huemer appears: <3 https://t.co/3MNj…
Zis moment when you go through the latest issue of Philosophical Studies and suddenly Mike Huemer appears: <3 https://t.co/3MNjB9cFbD
A liberal realist answer to debunking skeptics: the empirical case for realism https://t.co/Z0kJb3mxEN