| Title |
The Scottish Structural Proteomics Facility: targets, methods and outputs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10969-010-9090-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muse Oke, Lester G. Carter, Kenneth A. Johnson, Huanting Liu, Stephen A. McMahon, Xuan Yan, Melina Kerou, Nadine D. Weikart, Nadia Kadi, Md. Arif Sheikh, Stefan Schmelz, Mark Dorward, Michal Zawadzki, Christopher Cozens, Helen Falconer, Helen Powers, Ian M. Overton, C. A. Johannes van Niekerk, Xu Peng, Prakash Patel, Roger A. Garrett, David Prangishvili, Catherine H. Botting, Peter J. Coote, David T. F. Dryden, Geoffrey J. Barton, Ulrich Schwarz-Linek, Gregory L. Challis, Garry L. Taylor, Malcolm F. White, James H. Naismith |
| Abstract |
The Scottish Structural Proteomics Facility was funded to develop a laboratory scale approach to high throughput structure determination. The effort was successful in that over 40 structures were determined. These structures and the methods harnessed to obtain them are reported here. This report reflects on the value of automation but also on the continued requirement for a high degree of scientific and technical expertise. The efficiency of the process poses challenges to the current paradigm of structural analysis and publication. In the 5 year period we published ten peer-reviewed papers reporting structural data arising from the pipeline. Nevertheless, the number of structures solved exceeded our ability to analyse and publish each new finding. By reporting the experimental details and depositing the structures we hope to maximize the impact of the project by allowing others to follow up the relevant biology. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 29% |
| Researcher | 26 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 29% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#6
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,033
of 107,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them