↓ Skip to main content

Impact of soil salinity on the microbial structure of halophyte rhizosphere microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Impact of soil salinity on the microbial structure of halophyte rhizosphere microbiome
Published in
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11274-018-2509-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salma Mukhtar, Babur Saeed Mirza, Samina Mehnaz, Muhammad Sajjad Mirza, Joan Mclean, Kauser Abdulla Malik

Abstract

The rhizosphere microbiome plays a significant role in the life of plants in promoting plant survival under adverse conditions. However, limited information is available about microbial diversity in saline environments. In the current study, we compared the composition of the rhizosphere microbiomes of the halophytes Urochloa, Kochia, Salsola, and Atriplex living in moderate and high salinity environments (Khewra salt mines; Pakistan) with that of the non-halophyte Triticum. Soil microbiomes analysis using pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene indicated that Actinobacteria were dominant in saline soil samples whereas Proteobacteria predominated in non-saline soil samples. Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Bacteriodetes and Thaumarchaeota were predominant phyla in saline and non-saline soils, whereas Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Gemmatimonadetes and the unclassified WPS-2 were less abundant. Sequences from Euryarchaeota, Ignavibacteriae, and Nanohaloarchaeota were identified only from the rhizosphere of halophytes. Dominant halophilic bacteria and archaea identified in this study included Agrococcus, Armatimonadetes gp4, Halalkalicoccus, Haloferula and Halobacterium. Our analysis showed that increases in soil salinity correlated with significant differences in the alpha and beta diversity of the microbial communities across saline and non-saline soil samples. Having a complete inventory of the soil bacteria from different saline environments in Pakistan will help in the discovery of potential inoculants for crops growing on salt-affected land.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 33 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Environmental Science 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 39 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,854,356
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#80
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,449
of 336,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.