Title |
Tall-statured grasses: a useful functional group for invasion science
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-018-1815-z |
Authors |
Susan Canavan, Laura A. Meyerson, Jasmin G. Packer, Petr Pyšek, Noëlie Maurel, Vanessa Lozano, David M. Richardson, Giuseppe Brundu, Kim Canavan, Angela Cicatelli, Jan Čuda, Wayne Dawson, Franz Essl, Francesco Guarino, Wen-Yong Guo, Mark van Kleunen, Holger Kreft, Carla Lambertini, Jan Pergl, Hana Skálová, Robert J. Soreng, Vernon Visser, Maria S. Vorontsova, Patrick Weigelt, Marten Winter, John R. U. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 3 | 38% |
Germany | 3 | 38% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 25 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 25% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,806,656
of 25,047,899 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,000
of 2,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,616
of 339,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,047,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.