↓ Skip to main content

Combining material- and community-based implementation strategies for scaling up: the case of supporting low-achieving middle school students

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Combining material- and community-based implementation strategies for scaling up: the case of supporting low-achieving middle school students
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10649-018-9835-2
Authors

Susanne Prediger, Claudia Fischer, Christoph Selter, Christian Schöber

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 40%
Mathematics 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2020.
All research outputs
#10,731,328
of 14,123,595 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#563
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,459
of 273,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,123,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.