↓ Skip to main content

Train-of-four and double burst stimulation fade at the great toe and thumb

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, April 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Train-of-four and double burst stimulation fade at the great toe and thumb
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, April 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf03014459
Authors

Yuhji Saitoh, Yasuhiro Koitabashi, Koshi Makita, Hiroyoshi Tanaka, Keisuke Amaha

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,185,560
of 13,401,480 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#484
of 1,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,185
of 268,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,401,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.