↓ Skip to main content

The cloud-free global energy balance and inferred cloud radiative effects: an assessment based on direct observations and climate models

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
The cloud-free global energy balance and inferred cloud radiative effects: an assessment based on direct observations and climate models
Published in
Climate Dynamics, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4413-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Wild, Maria Z. Hakuba, Doris Folini, Patricia Dörig-Ott, Christoph Schär, Seiji Kato, Charles N. Long

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#481,287
of 14,064,239 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#58
of 3,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,412
of 273,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#2
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.