↓ Skip to main content

Demographic strategies of a dominant tree species in response to logging in a degraded subtropical forest in Southeast China

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Demographic strategies of a dominant tree species in response to logging in a degraded subtropical forest in Southeast China
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13595-018-0764-0
Authors

Xianyu Yang, Shouzhong Li, Baocheng Shen, Yuyan Wu, Suitao Sun, Rong Liu, Ruibo Zha, Shou-Li Li

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,122,103
of 13,401,480 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#283
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,993
of 268,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,401,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.