So what? This systematic review found pharmaceutical company funding of research was strongly associated with favourable findings for the company's products. If funding can affect scientists and science, v likely it can influence politicians and policy.
@StuartGillesp16 @ScepticalDoctor Largely untrue and highly dependent on the study area. Since you cite no data, here are some: https://t.co/aGhqaLqUHn https://t.co/U7LrZ2eu1u These are worth a deeper dive as they pertain to nutrition https://t.co/3YuUAdfN
RT @martinwhite33: @ggkuhnle That's what meta-analyses do - compare like with like - reasonable homogeneity is a requirement. See for examp…
@ggkuhnle That's what meta-analyses do - compare like with like - reasonable homogeneity is a requirement. See for example: https://t.co/FBQOyj1sMn
Monetary influence effects outcomes Would LOVE to see a study determining if political bias has a similar effect on outcomes https://t.co/bkokgJoCIb
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
RT @SeismicPirate: The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking rep…
The heart attack lie was bought and paid for. Even the @USSG cited the bogus @ProfGlantz study in his annual smoking report. Ethical scientists worldwide forced it's retraction. As I noted, follow the $$ @RepMarkkanen @SenEdMcBroom @RepJackBergman #vapings
Conclusions Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than studies sponsored by other sources.
RT @Meshproblems01: @HenkJanOut It has been proven that research studies sponsored by drug/device companies are more likely to have outcome…
RT @Meshproblems01: @HenkJanOut It has been proven that research studies sponsored by drug/device companies are more likely to have outcome…
@HenkJanOut It has been proven that research studies sponsored by drug/device companies are more likely to have outcomes favouring the sponsor than are studies with other sponsors. So yes, it is more trusworthy. https://t.co/162a2DmXvT https://t.co/43Uyrx
RT @WakeArtisan: How interesting. An updated meta-analysis in @yourICM explored link between sponsorship and research outcomes. Drug and de…
RT @WakeArtisan: How interesting. An updated meta-analysis in @yourICM explored link between sponsorship and research outcomes. Drug and de…
RT @WakeArtisan: How interesting. An updated meta-analysis in @yourICM explored link between sponsorship and research outcomes. Drug and de…
RT @PsychRecovery: @SameiHuda @dawso007 @dan_w_joyce @ClinpsychLucy @ReadReadj @MaudsleyDebates @KingsIoPPN @TrinityMed1 Actually, I AM cal…
RT @PsychRecovery: @SameiHuda @dawso007 @dan_w_joyce @ClinpsychLucy @ReadReadj @MaudsleyDebates @KingsIoPPN @TrinityMed1 Actually, I AM cal…
@SameiHuda @dawso007 @dan_w_joyce @ClinpsychLucy @ReadReadj @MaudsleyDebates @KingsIoPPN @TrinityMed1 Actually, I AM calling out all fields of medicine. It's simple. "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy
RT @joaquinfdezoft: “Ensayos Clínicos patrocinados por la Industria tienen Resultados de Eficacia y Conclusiones más favorables q otros Est…
RT @joaquinfdezoft: “Ensayos Clínicos patrocinados por la Industria tienen Resultados de Eficacia y Conclusiones más favorables q otros Est…
RT @pash22: Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than studies…
RT @Rasha_Fadlallah: It’s time to reconsider including ‘research sponsorship’ as a risk of bias criterion in tools used to assess risk of b…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Yes @TheLancetPsych please take note. Why did you publish this schlock exercise and depression studtly with declaratio…
RT @joaquinfdezoft: “Ensayos Clínicos patrocinados por la Industria tienen Resultados de Eficacia y Conclusiones más favorables q otros Est…
RT @jaherom: Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis https://t.co/oD047vgpFm
Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis https://t.co/oD047vgpFm
“Ensayos Clínicos patrocinados por la Industria tienen Resultados de Eficacia y Conclusiones más favorables q otros Estudios patrocinados por otras fuentes”
This is very important.
RT @jvrbntz: Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. by John Ioannidis https://t.co/ufKiDNnCQ2 https://t.co…
RT @jvrbntz: Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. by John Ioannidis https://t.co/ufKiDNnCQ2 https://t.co…
RT @Rasha_Fadlallah: It’s time to reconsider including ‘research sponsorship’ as a risk of bias criterion in tools used to assess risk of b…
RT @Rasha_Fadlallah: It’s time to reconsider including ‘research sponsorship’ as a risk of bias criterion in tools used to assess risk of b…
RT @drpaolandmd: .@Johnbo100 @DePacotilla @stella_navarro @paolapaezmd @MedicosSinMarca @ocarrenom más leña para la fogata!!! https://t.co/…
RT @drpaolandmd: .@Johnbo100 @DePacotilla @stella_navarro @paolapaezmd @MedicosSinMarca @ocarrenom más leña para la fogata!!! https://t.co/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Yes @TheLancetPsych please take note. Why did you publish this schlock exercise and depression studtly with declaratio…
RT @haiderwarraich: What does ROI stand for again? 🤑 https://t.co/pC32Tc8hWR
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Yes @TheLancetPsych please take note. Why did you publish this schlock exercise and depression studtly with declaratio…
Yes @TheLancetPsych please take note. Why did you publish this schlock exercise and depression studtly with declaration of interest much longer than the abstract? https://t.co/n7RXpt1pTw
Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than studies sponsored by other sources https://t.co/rmfHjM9D1g via @joel_lexchin
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
RT @drpaolandmd: .@Johnbo100 @DePacotilla @stella_navarro @paolapaezmd @MedicosSinMarca @ocarrenom más leña para la fogata!!! https://t.co/…
.@Johnbo100 @DePacotilla @stella_navarro @paolapaezmd @MedicosSinMarca @ocarrenom más leña para la fogata!!!
RT @jvrbntz: Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. by John Ioannidis https://t.co/ufKiDNnCQ2 https://t.co…
It’s time to reconsider including ‘research sponsorship’ as a risk of bias criterion in tools used to assess risk of bias of studies included in systematic reviews @GRADE_McMaster @GRADE_WG @Elie__Akl @CERQualNet
RT @jvrbntz: Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. by John Ioannidis https://t.co/ufKiDNnCQ2 https://t.co…
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
"Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than studies sponsored by other sources." https://t.co/LHYIGeEjjU
RT @jvrbntz: Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. by John Ioannidis https://t.co/ufKiDNnCQ2 https://t.co…
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
RT @jvrbntz: Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. by John Ioannidis https://t.co/ufKiDNnCQ2 https://t.co…
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
El esponsoreo de la industria se asocia a mayores reportes de eficacia en las investigaciones. https://t.co/D3N3gnZU8t
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
RT @lobrowR: Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy r…
Meta analysis on medical trials : "Drug and device studies sponsored by manufacturing companies have more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than studies sponsored by other sources".
Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. by John Ioannidis https://t.co/ufKiDNnCQ2
What does ROI stand for again? 🤑
RT @lasecip: Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis https://t.co/EPoWiWjH4W #IntCareMed
RT @KenSPope: Meta-Analysis: Drug & Device Studies Sponsored by Manufacturing Companies Have More Favorable Efficacy Results & Conclusions…
RT @lasecip: Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis https://t.co/EPoWiWjH4W #IntCareMed
Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis https://t.co/EPoWiWjH4W #IntCareMed