@gabedeem @_MarkMcCormack Top neuroscientists who have published numerous neurological studies on porn & internet addiction took Grubbs to task in this commentary: https://t.co/xTsjgKbIDq They agreed with YBOP that the CPUI-9 is badly flawed. Note: J
ICYMI, Free e-access till April 13, 2019: Commentary on @JoshuaGrubbsPhD Archives of Sexual Behavior Target Article by Matthias Brand et al. – Theoretical Assumptions on Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence...” https://t.co/AS0VcEG6Y1
Free e-access: Commentary on @JoshuaGrubbsPhD's Archives of Sexual Behavior Target Article by Matthias Brand et al. – “Theoretical Assumptions on Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence and Mechanisms of Addictive or Compulsive Use of Pornography” h
There have already been 3 commentaries on the Grubbs paper (which David Ley completely mischaracterized in his blog post). All commentaries punch huge holes in Joshua Grubbs assertions. This one has actual neuroscientists: https://t.co/PmsWR5dKD4
#CompulsivePornography Theoretical Assumptions on Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence and Mechanisms of Addictive or Compulsive Use of Pornography: Are the Two “Conditions” as Theoretically Distinct as Suggested? https://t.co/iSFwEFrzqT