↓ Skip to main content

Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40902-016-0086-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Il Gyu Kang, Seon Tae Kim, Seok Ho Lee, Min Kwan Baek

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 100%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2018.
All research outputs
#10,653,370
of 13,390,371 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#15
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,748
of 268,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,390,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them