| Title |
Research on carbon price in emissions trading scheme: a bibliometric analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-018-3433-6 |
| Authors |
Chang-Jing Ji, Xiao-Yi Li, Yu-Jie Hu, Xiang-Yu Wang, Bao-Jun Tang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,647,367
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#282
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,439
of 333,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.