| Title |
Congo River’s Grand Inga hydroelectricity scheme: linking environmental history, policy and impact
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water History, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12685-009-0001-8 |
| Authors |
Kate B. Showers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,410,276
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Water History
#81
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,062
of 109,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water History
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.