↓ Skip to main content

Uncertain human consequences in asteroid risk analysis and the global catastrophe threshold

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Uncertain human consequences in asteroid risk analysis and the global catastrophe threshold
Published in
Natural Hazards, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3419-4
Authors

Seth D. Baum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 19%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,976,200
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#708
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,856
of 329,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.