↓ Skip to main content

The Linguistic Subversion of Mental Representation

Overview of attention for article published in Minds and Machines, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
The Linguistic Subversion of Mental Representation
Published in
Minds and Machines, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11023-012-9275-1
Authors

Whit Schonbein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,839,997
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#209
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,802
of 168,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.