Accuracy in identifying students’ miscues during oral reading: a taxonomy of scorers’ mismarkings

New paper out in Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary journal with Deborah Reed @IAReading. How reliable is #CBM-R data collection? https://t.co/xRtAsgLJ7u

RT @DDNJ12: Too many parents of struggling readers know that "progress" is often very subjective: "In 98% of the passages, scorers disagr…

RT @DDNJ12: Too many parents of struggling readers know that "progress" is often very subjective: "In 98% of the passages, scorers disagr…

RT @DDNJ12: Too many parents of struggling readers know that "progress" is often very subjective: "In 98% of the passages, scorers disagr…

RT @DDNJ12: Too many parents of struggling readers know that "progress" is often very subjective: "In 98% of the passages, scorers disagr…

RT @RobinowitzCtr: From experience, I know that training on what constitutes a miscue, along with guided practice administering oral readin…

RT @DDNJ12: Too many parents of struggling readers know that "progress" is often very subjective: "In 98% of the passages, scorers disagr…

From experience, I know that training on what constitutes a miscue, along with guided practice administering oral reading fluency assessments improves inter-rater reliability.

Yikes! Parents should advocate for recordings of IRI/IRR/CBM-R's as it seems to be a more accurate means of showing word accuracy. I wonder about the accuracy of teachers who teach younger grades? Words are shorter/less complex passages. #FAPE #IDE

#SayDyslexia Multiple measures and qualitative data rank supreme over progress monitoring & State Mandated Standardized testing. Clear guidance helps students close achievement gaps, learn about the areas that need strengthening.

Too many parents of struggling readers know that "progress" is often very subjective: "In 98% of the passages, scorers disagreed on the number of words read correctly—the score used for screening and progress... https://t.co/dslpmNPfT7

#new in Reading and Writing: Accuracy in identifying students’ miscues during oral reading: a taxonomy of scorers’ mismarkings https://t.co/btUNNtCS9J #reading #writing

This is interesting, CBM and IRI scoring may not be as accurate as thought. However, was there a difference in the level of accuracy between CBM-R and IRI's? (Reed, Cummings, Schaper, Lynn, Biancarosa, 2018) https://t.co/K07xhWAKcz