Title |
High-Precision Numerical Simulations on a CUDA GPU: Kerr Black Hole Tails
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Scientific Computing, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10915-012-9679-3 |
Authors |
Gaurav Khanna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 38% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,886,054
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scientific Computing
#17
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,422
of 282,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scientific Computing
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.