↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Agroforestry Systems, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Agroforestry Systems, January 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1006295530509
Authors

E. Styger, J. E. M. Rakotoarimanana, R. Rabevohitra, E. C. M. Fernandes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 125 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 25%
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 50%
Environmental Science 43 31%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Unspecified 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 7 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,173,424
of 13,034,624 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#334
of 552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,799
of 280,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,034,624 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.