↓ Skip to main content

INFLUENCE OF WIKIPEDIA AND OTHER WEB RESOURCES ON ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE DECISIONS. A WEB-BASED SURVEY

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 165)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
Title
INFLUENCE OF WIKIPEDIA AND OTHER WEB RESOURCES ON ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE DECISIONS. A WEB-BASED SURVEY
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a867
Pubmed ID
Authors

B Rössler, H Holldack, K Schebesta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,479,827
of 7,907,411 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#45
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,818
of 241,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,907,411 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.