@anthroqveer @rstatstweet There are a couple of papers I can think of at looking at: https://t.co/z3sQJxkKRS. Also have a look at: https://t.co/aUu0YmGRy7 and https://t.co/bdMytVX7ez
About MTurk, computer-generated response, and some ways to deal with that https://t.co/EQwBWzSDgp https://t.co/1DuAZaPT9b https://t.co/E50FQDX1KO
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
Tagging @WilCunningham
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
Detecting computer-generated random responding in questionnaire-based data: A comparison of seven indices https://t.co/wRm70mK8py
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
RT @geoleonardelli: Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
Ways to detect bot data in online surveys. HT @LindaSkitka https://t.co/gQRVJMboZO
Trois doctorants en #psychologie s'attaquent aux logiciels malveillants répondant aux études online, et comparent sept techniques pour les détecter - https://t.co/bANiF7eEen
RT @abbysussman: And this new paper on detecting non-human responses (rather than inattentive humans) in online studies: https://t.co/g9OWD…
Detecting computer-generated random responding in questionnaire-based data: A comparison of seven indices https://t.co/fk1FKfYTaS BehResM
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
@LVlynette @BepUink ☑️☑️☑️
RT @sarahgollust: Want to know what I’m worrying about *right now*? Robots answering my public opinion surveys! Thankfully lots of other sm…
@kurtjgray @SamuelJamesWest This is also concerning because the new paper that's going around about bot-detection indices is based on the assumption that bot responses are random (uniform). https://t.co/ILuWQ2Hj34
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
@mnitabach some data on the bot menace...
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
@montaljd interesting stuff!!!!!
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
Literally out right as this is happening! Don’t forget you can also try @jscofield24 and I’s shiny app on your data: https://t.co/Ci2XBjMyrd
Detecting computer-generated random responding in questionnaire-based data: https://t.co/yyk0QcBn1Z
@NivReggev This article outlining some statistical techniques to filter out bots may be useful https://t.co/WCBkdGzkED
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
Raises the interesting question of whether a representative sample of robots might achieve acceptable levels of external validity.
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @martin_hebart: Relevant for anyone running online experiments: Detecting computer-generated random responding in questionnaire-based da…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
And this new paper on detecting non-human responses (rather than inattentive humans) in online studies: https://t.co/g9OWDkuG0T
Relevant for anyone running online experiments: Detecting computer-generated random responding in questionnaire-based data: A comparison of seven indices https://t.co/zbgNiQ3rtI
I did not know that I needed to be worry about robots taking my surveys; now I do...
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
cc: @RexDouglass
RT @alexnaisyd: Using MTurk? Check this https://t.co/burmBAfdcV
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
RT @thosjleeper: Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting suc…
Using MTurk? Check this
Worried about robots completing your online surveys? New paper compares the performance of seven metrics for detecting such behavior. https://t.co/n4ij2LH6bz https://t.co/ElEc6p1Afm