↓ Skip to main content

Progress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Progress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)
Published in
Hydrobiologia, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10750-018-3708-7
Authors

Martin Dohrmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#11,839,429
of 13,343,384 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#1,949
of 2,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,868
of 267,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#55
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,343,384 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.