↓ Skip to main content

Spatial variation in the diet of Patagonotothen tessellata (Pisces, Nototheniidae) from the fjords and channels of southern Chilean Patagonia

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Spatial variation in the diet of Patagonotothen tessellata (Pisces, Nototheniidae) from the fjords and channels of southern Chilean Patagonia
Published in
Polar Biology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00300-015-1726-8
Authors

Mathias Hüne, Rodrigo Vega

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 33%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 67%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2015.
All research outputs
#10,838,308
of 12,226,820 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#796
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,799
of 251,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#33
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.