2. 是否存在危險的作用機制?是的。他們開始生產刺突蛋白。刺突蛋白是使呼吸道感染致命的原因。 3.內部一致嗎?還有其他現在公認的可能致命的情況嗎?當然,心肌炎。 FDA 同意 🔗 Bradford Hill Tenets 布拉德福德山原則 https://t.co/rHafapckbl
"Bradford Hill's considerations published in 1965 had an enormous influence on attempts to separate causal from non-causal explanations of observed associations. These considerations were often applied as a checklist of criteria, " https://t.co/2eTabO1MXE
It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill (https://t.co/oD0BG2ck7r) tenets of causality for medicinal product causing death. Our CDC, as of December 23, 2022, has over 16,000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine.
@Mangan150 @SentientBlobBob @REV_Insulin_Res @ThelastStyleb16 The context of the correlation matters. There's no single number in the risk ratios than can tell you if a correlation is causation or not. Often bias can overweigh association strength. https
@itosettiMD_MBA @tskould The Hill criteria are obsolete. Nonetheless, any reasonable casual model would identify lax gun laws and proliferation of high-capacity rifles as a causal factor in mass murders. https://t.co/45hQk2I40a
@Montaigne01 @HeckofaLiberal @jojo_nazara @thereal_truther Re: "Statisticians think of causal inference in terms of the potential outcomes framework." It's really sad when you don't even read the sources you lie about. Once again: https://t.co/Qowj5lSyW
RT @baumeister_se: @epi_punk Rothmann & Greenland Hill’s Criteria for Causality in Handbook of Biostatistics 2005 / DOI: 10.1002/047001181…
RT @baumeister_se: @epi_punk Rothmann & Greenland Hill’s Criteria for Causality in Handbook of Biostatistics 2005 / DOI: 10.1002/047001181…
@epi_punk Rothmann & Greenland Hill’s Criteria for Causality in Handbook of Biostatistics 2005 / DOI: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a03072 https://t.co/VpPERRc0Mg
@TuckerGoodrich @DrAricSudicky @jasonmpeirce @AnnearJosh @GeorgiaEdeMD @GrassBased @travis_statham @SPalmeri_RD @KetoCarnivore @TuitNutrition @DietDoctor1 Bear in mind that Bradford Hill himself said: "None of my nine viewpoints can bring indisputable ev
@amadiscervantes @ranilillanjum And/or Bradford-Hill's 'aspects' are often squeezed into counterfactualism. http://t.co/p7JlVo1s