↓ Skip to main content

Ten-Year Survival in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis After Lung Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 573)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Ten-Year Survival in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis After Lung Transplantation
Published in
Lung, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00408-015-9794-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liesbeth ten Klooster, George D. Nossent, Johanna M. Kwakkel-van Erp, Diana A. van Kessel, Erik J. Oudijk, Ed A. van de Graaf, Bart Luijk, Rogier A. Hoek, Bernt van den Blink, Peter Th. van Hal, Erik A. Verschuuren, Wim van der Bij, Coline H. van Moorsel, Jan C. Grutters

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and lethal fibrosing lung disease with a median survival of approximately 3 years after diagnosis. The only medical option to improve survival in IPF is lung transplantation (LTX). The purpose of this study was to evaluate trajectory data of IPF patients listed for LTX and to investigate the survival after LTX. Data were retrospectively collected from September 1989 until July 2011 of all IPF patients registered for LTX in the Netherlands. Patients were included after revision of the diagnosis based on the criteria set by the ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT. Trajectory data, clinical data at time of screening, and donor data were collected. In total, 98 IPF patients were listed for LTX. During the waiting list period, 30 % of the patients died. Mean pulmonary artery pressure, 6-min walking distance, and the use of supplemental oxygen were significant predictors of mortality on the waiting list. Fifty-two patients received LTX with a median overall survival after transplantation of 10 years. This study demonstrated a 10-year survival time after LTX in IPF. Furthermore, our study demonstrated a significantly better survival after bilateral LTX in IPF compared to single LTX although bilateral LTX patients were significantly younger.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Unspecified 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Unspecified 5 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 8%
Other 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,131,778
of 12,230,159 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#23
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,223
of 250,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,230,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.