Title |
First record of a wilt disease of banana plants associated with phytoplasmas in Solomon Islands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Australasian Plant Disease Notes, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13314-015-0163-4 |
Authors |
R. I. Davis, J. Henderson, L. M. Jones, A. R. McTaggart, C. O’Dwyer, F. Tsatsia, C. Fanai, J. B. Rossel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,172,919
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Plant Disease Notes
#1
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,213
of 264,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Plant Disease Notes
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them