↓ Skip to main content

Better to Stay or Go? A Longitudinal Study of Mobility over the Compulsory Educational Life Course

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Better to Stay or Go? A Longitudinal Study of Mobility over the Compulsory Educational Life Course
Published in
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12061-018-9263-9
Authors

Amy Sweet, Richard Harris, David Manley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 75%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,675,100
of 13,325,587 outputs
Outputs from Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
#68
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,463
of 268,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,325,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.