Une critique indigène, comme disent nos amis sociologues, de l'analyse coût-avantage et son inadaptation aux temps de grande incertitude. On a besoin de nouveaux outils... @Strategie_Gouv gagnerait à faire ce grand saut vers la complexité. cc @fabtransitio
Cc @AC2N1
RT @bapeterj: Why cost-benefit analysis is not fit for purpose on climate -> https://t.co/4lRGKKtNie Issues with integrated assessment mod…
Why cost-benefit analysis is not fit for purpose on climate -> https://t.co/4lRGKKtNie Issues with integrated assessment modules -> https://t.co/hpYWj0obBk & https://t.co/c9rXjrCH4Z For climate economics we need different models, more variety
@OliPerkins2 @flimsin Its mostly not published yet, but we are funding work by Doyne Farmer's group on this and there's some general background here https://t.co/SjBCUFqx6V. On the pessimistic front ABMs show greater econ damages, e.g. https://t.co/5jZBepD
@FrancescaLaros1 @RMaria_drc @manlius84 @gomezgardenes @alexvespi @nadameli @StefBattiston @evoluchico @GuidoCaldarelli @CompleNet @INET_Complexity @PennyMealy More of a lit review, possibly a bit out of date now, also from us & @camjhep: https://t.co/
RT @mammuthus: @PatrickTBrown31 @KenCaldeira @jmorenocruz Very interesting. You write that results sensitive to shape of mitigation functio…
@PatrickTBrown31 @KenCaldeira @jmorenocruz Very interesting. You write that results sensitive to shape of mitigation function. DICE et al mitigation assumptions are questionable (https://t.co/SjBCUFqx6V). I wonder what your results would look like incorpor
RT @mammuthus: Here's Stern https://t.co/l31UJHA1iX. Or Pindyck https://t.co/LbSMVPYNTX. Or Farmer https://t.co/SjBCUFqx6V. Shrug.
Here's Stern https://t.co/l31UJHA1iX. Or Pindyck https://t.co/LbSMVPYNTX. Or Farmer https://t.co/SjBCUFqx6V. Shrug.
RT @mammuthus: @richardabetts @MLiebreich ok, well, if you want to read something that argues that more convention modelling isn't up to sc…
@richardabetts @MLiebreich ok, well, if you want to read something that argues that more convention modelling isn't up to scratch then check out https://t.co/SjBCUFqx6V
@RichardTol Perhaps they don’t show per se, but they certainly don’t assume either. For instance, in a related paper they summarise the assumptions of various CGE-based IAMs https://t.co/QGAN2wmNyK (table in Supp material), another example in this lit: htt
RT @janssenjacob: @lexhoogduin @MaartjeJanse Het gaat juist om de kleine kans op catastrofe. Nordhaus was eerst met geintegreerde modellen,…
RT @janssenjacob: @lexhoogduin @MaartjeJanse Het gaat juist om de kleine kans op catastrofe. Nordhaus was eerst met geintegreerde modellen,…
RT @janssenjacob: @lexhoogduin @MaartjeJanse Het gaat juist om de kleine kans op catastrofe. Nordhaus was eerst met geintegreerde modellen,…
@lexhoogduin @MaartjeJanse Het gaat juist om de kleine kans op catastrofe. Nordhaus was eerst met geintegreerde modellen, en won daarom de prijs. Zijn modellen en schadefunctie zijn achterhaald ( https://t.co/T67SEGt28F, https://t.co/nRTpBhpVDN) Nordhaus g
Despite their influence in policy, the outputs of IAMs are now described, not in jest, as being as “close to useless” https://t.co/QisCij6y8p
A third wave in the economics of climate change: agent-based models vs DSGE https://t.co/G8id9fgFlE
RT @tannerlib: A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change - Springer http://t.co/2fksy7G1eh
Now, to read this on economics of climate change, by among others @camjhep and @t8el https://t.co/RMv3nNrgNI
Modeling uncertainty in climate models requires economists to go beyond equilibrium orthodoxy and think in systems https://t.co/PWYitsqHb7
A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change - Springer http://t.co/2fksy7G1eh