| Title |
Amur tigers and leopards returning to China: direct evidence and a landscape conservation plan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10980-015-0278-1 |
| Authors |
Tianming Wang, Limin Feng, Pu Mou, Jianguo Wu, James L. D. Smith, Wenhong Xiao, Haitao Yang, Hailong Dou, Xiaodan Zhao, Yanchao Cheng, Bo Zhou, Hongyan Wu, Li Zhang, Yu Tian, Qingxi Guo, Xiaojun Kou, Xuemei Han, Dale G. Miquelle, Chadwick D. Oliver, Rumei Xu, Jianping Ge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 26% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,598,511
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#128
of 1,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,097
of 286,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.