↓ Skip to main content

Esophageal bronchogenic cyst and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Esophageal bronchogenic cyst and review of the literature
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4082-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria S. Altieri, Richard Zheng, Aurora D. Pryor, Alan Heimann, Soojin Ahn, Dana A. Telem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Unspecified 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Unspecified 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,725,344
of 6,395,401 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,681
of 2,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,972
of 200,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#95
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,395,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.