Cofnas is a superficial blogger in the field of Jewish studies. He is not a scholar and doesn’t even engage with the academic literature in that field. He doesn’t read the tomes. He merely skims them. Of what value is his “work”? Andrew Joyce literally t
@T234565432 Recommend Cofnas' work https://t.co/lzmJvvbZXk https://t.co/yLTSbxYii7 https://t.co/jQKwD41CLr
@Shoon_Sean @AveAmericae @SerfinTurfin @LaurenWitzkeDE @ScottAdamsSays So your explanation for every reference of overrepresentation is in group preference? That is a bunch of nonsense. https://t.co/0LSpjhTymq
@CeaddaOfMercia @0Stefanos You and I both know you’re lying, lol https://t.co/0LSpjhTymq https://t.co/3WAS0uMfNz Attributing any and all success to “in group preference” is what BLM lovers do whenever they want to explain away the success of other races
@AwakenedCelt @KaliYug34303692 @wayotworld Just 7 pages https://t.co/1hDZufY5vV
Refuting it
@schizofrenzy Important question. Maybe. Here's Kevin MacDonald's thesis: https://t.co/APTlUwmtbk Cofnas doesn't agree: https://t.co/T8g6rOUaN7 Dutton does: https://t.co/inPtHYowfX Cofnas responds: https://t.co/4USyoo0PIT MacDonald reply w/ Cofnas' c
RT @Simon_Whitten: @AdamRutherford Glad this was just a joke and he didn't write a series of lengthy papers on this hypothesis. . . https…
@AdamRutherford Glad this was just a joke and he didn't write a series of lengthy papers on this hypothesis. . . https://t.co/aU4CCBTxrL https://t.co/25CyJbVGXj
@hnsvanniekerk His account of the exchange is accurate, though I respond in more detail to his arguments in my EPS comment: https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
@FistfulOfGitane @nathancofnas @Jinkinson1 @jpjjr1961 @JonathanKaplan Come on, at least he did an excellent job debunking Kevin Macdonald at least, and instead claimed jews evolved high IQs through natural selection with no evidence instead. https://t.co/4
@Sean__Last Better to take one issue at at time. Do you accept that liberal Jews promote and celebrate interracial conversion/intermarriage within the Jewish community and multicultural immigration to Israel (as can be seen on any Reform J website and as
@Sean__Last @KirkegaardEmil (as well as "multicultural" immigration to Israel). Among Reform/unaffiliated Jews—the ones who promote liberalism—intermarriage rate is 69% *not including nominal conversions*. Secular Jewish population is disappearing. This is
@Galatians_5 @DavidHival @Steve_Sailer You could, but as a matter of fact there would be no evidence to support that, as I discuss here: https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
@MikePStreetWear @Charles47043398 @AarickStriger "What sort of academic says that sort of thing?" - How many academic papers have you read? On what basis do you think no one would say they have to leave something out because of the journal's word limit? I
@Mahgraye @Race__Realist @DegenRolf https://t.co/LujgrSRPu6 He believes in Macdonalds Jewish conspiracy.
@HeatherSH22 @CathrynTownsend Have you also read the piece (1) by @nathancofnas to which @jollyheretic's article is a response, and Cofnas' response (2) to the latter? Why is the publication of such an exchange reprehensible? (1) https://t.co/SL6K31mSSc (
@MasahiroYuba I address that issue in my response to Dutton: https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
@vilheisk @JiiPeePuro @PetraNyqvist @SumeliusMona @JunesLokka Tässä muuten vähän tutkimusta joka kumoaa MacDonaldin "tutkimuksen" perusoletukset. https://t.co/qsK9Fy3AUA
@jumbojs @TOOEdit (1) Indeed. The strategy that MacDonald attributes to Jews would not only be ineffective, it would be a very Rube Goldbergish way to achieve goals that could be achieved by much simpler means. See https://t.co/aF1pTTgzXM
@HermesDiaktoros @NewRightAmerica @StefanMolyneux Re liberal Jews pushing to bring "diversity" and "multiculturalism" into the Jewish gene pool in the US: https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
@ArielFelidae @TOOAJoyce I explain why I described my hypothesis as the default one--there's a very logical reason. See the section 'What Should Be the "Default Hypothesis"?' https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
@TOOAJoyce Did you read the article? Note that the editor (i.e., the "academic gatekeeper") who accepted it also accepted Dutton's article defending MacDonald. https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
RT @anukasan1977: @nathancofnas @Steve_Sailer 1) This is unconvincing. Higher IQ + location doesn't explain the *extent* of Jewish overrep…
@nathancofnas @Steve_Sailer 1) This is unconvincing. Higher IQ + location doesn't explain the *extent* of Jewish overrepresentation in certain intellectual movements, bc the much larger gentile population still produces larger absolute #'s of high-IQ "com
RT @Steve_Sailer: That American Jews tend to be more ethnocentric than American white gentiles is implicit in the opposite meanings of Jewi…
RT @Steve_Sailer: That American Jews tend to be more ethnocentric than American white gentiles is implicit in the opposite meanings of Jewi…
That American Jews tend to be more ethnocentric than American white gentiles is implicit in the opposite meanings of Jewish Guilt (see the great Philip Roth's "Portnoy's Complaint") and White Guilt (see the oeuvre of @TitaniaMcGrath).
@RWLS1 @TOOEdit @AltJewish @__ice9 @Hereditarian98 I give the evidence here: https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
@Steve_Sailer Who said I care whether Jews are ethnocentric? Kevin MacDonald says that they are high in ethnocentrism, and I provided evidence that they aren't. https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
@__ice9 @YmeChlore @TOOEdit @Hereditarian98 I wrote about that issue in my last comment on MacDonald. High Jewish intermarriage makes absolutely no sense on any reasonable interpretation of his theory. https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
RT @nathancofnas: If liberal Jews were engaged in a group evolutionary strategy, they could have easily succeeded: with a low intermarriage…
RT @deBeauxOs1: Bang. But crackpots like Jordang Pettyson uncritically quote & promote Kevin MacDonald bc they profit from the increased…
RT @nathancofnas: @pzmyers @mattlodder @_Saeen_ You realize I was arguing that MacDonald's theory is pseudoscience, right? The journal that…
Bang. But crackpots like Jordang Pettyson uncritically quote & promote Kevin MacDonald bc they profit from the increased revenue stream it provides from #antiSemitic #whiteSupremacists
RT @nathancofnas: If liberal Jews were engaged in a group evolutionary strategy, they could have easily succeeded: with a low intermarriage…
RT @nathancofnas: @pzmyers @mattlodder @_Saeen_ You realize I was arguing that MacDonald's theory is pseudoscience, right? The journal that…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
@Ivuoma That tweet misrepresented the debate. My paper argued that MacDonald's theory about Jews is pseudoscience: https://t.co/CdS5tVE0tQ Someone published a defense of KMac in another journal, and the journal quickly published my rebuttal: https://t.co/
@pzmyers @mattlodder @_Saeen_ You realize I was arguing that MacDonald's theory is pseudoscience, right? The journal that published Dutton's defense of MacDonald published my rebuttal, which said that his theory has no basis in empirical evidence or evolut
@stevenmklein @ortoiseortoise On the other hand it's now more difficult for MacDonald to say that he didn't get a fair hearing and that he's been censored. I think most people who are following the debate who read both Dutton and my rebuttal will be more c
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
@TOOEdit My response to Dutton: https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @robsica: "There are no theoretical principles or established empirical findings of evolutionary psychology that make MacDonald’s theory…
If liberal Jews were engaged in a group evolutionary strategy, they could have easily succeeded: with a low intermarriage rate and 4-6 children per couple post WWII, Jews would now be a generation away from demographic dominance. No clever tricks needed. h
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
RT @robsica: "There are no theoretical principles or established empirical findings of evolutionary psychology that make MacDonald’s theory…
RT @nathancofnas: I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit o…
I peer reviewed Dutton's anti-Cofnas, pro-Kevin MacDonald article for Evolutionary Psychological Science. In the spirit of open debate, I recommended acceptance. But here's why I think he's wrong: https://t.co/eXmPDOqQPQ
"There are no theoretical principles or established empirical findings of evolutionary psychology that make MacDonald’s theory 'plausible.'” -@nathancofnas https://t.co/1BMQUZBPKt
Is Kevin MacDonald’s Theory of Judaism “Plausible”? A Response to Dutton (2018) https://t.co/w5HPve6TeJ