↓ Skip to main content

Hard Determinism and Punishment: A Practical Reductio

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Philosophy, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Hard Determinism and Punishment: A Practical Reductio
Published in
Law and Philosophy, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10982-011-9099-9
Authors

Saul Smilansky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Other 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 9 53%
Unspecified 2 12%
Psychology 2 12%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,616,928
of 13,221,142 outputs
Outputs from Law and Philosophy
#46
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,310
of 247,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Philosophy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,221,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.