↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of equity principles for international climate policy based on an integrated assessment model

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of equity principles for international climate policy based on an integrated assessment model
Published in
Natural Hazards, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3408-7
Authors

Zhifu Mi, Hua Liao, D’Maris Coffman, Yi-Ming Wei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 44%
Unspecified 4 44%
Environmental Science 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,116,426
of 12,400,657 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#575
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,903
of 269,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#30
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,400,657 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.