↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Habits, Priming and the Explanation of Mindless Action

Overview of attention for article published in Minds & Machines, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 160)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Habits, Priming and the Explanation of Mindless Action
Published in
Minds & Machines, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11023-016-9410-5
Authors

Ezio Di Nucci

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,856,088
of 12,374,131 outputs
Outputs from Minds & Machines
#41
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,541
of 269,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds & Machines
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,374,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.