↓ Skip to main content

The effects of endowment size and strategy method on third party punishment

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Economics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 177)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
The effects of endowment size and strategy method on third party punishment
Published in
Experimental Economics, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10683-015-9466-8
Authors

Jillian Jordan, Katherine McAuliffe, David Rand

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 32%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 33%
Unspecified 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#469,767
of 12,316,795 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Economics
#10
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,791
of 250,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Economics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,316,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.