@skepticscience @RARohde @theresphysics @dana1981 Yup. Many AGW denialists love abusing 'escalator' nonsense. End point bias, selection bias with use of broken trends, no statistically significant change point shown, etc. https://t.co/UjZKzbiE6g https:/
@RARohde Yup. It's end point bias, selection bias with abuse of broken trends, no statistically significant change point shown, special pleading, etc, as you've shown https://t.co/UjZKzbjbVO https://t.co/GDFGxfzwzf https://t.co/y4BcCSkuJJ https://t.co/H
@Daniel_Marbella @JohnRDrayton @hausfath @BerkeleyEarth The usual misleading tactics from your crowd. End point bias, selection bias with use of broken trends, no statistically significant change point shown, etc. https://t.co/UjZKzbiE6g https://t.co/r2
@JR4_Truth @mwicDallas The usual deceptive tactics from your crowd. End point bias, selection bias with use of broken trends, no statistically significant change point shown, etc. https://t.co/UjZKzbiE6g https://t.co/r2PDBsCGve https://t.co/y4BcCSjWUb h
@curryja @thomas_rackow @KenCaldeira @ramez What "slowdown"? It's just end point bias, selection bias with use of broken trends, no statistically significant change point shown, etc. https://t.co/UjZKzbjbVO https://t.co/r2PDBsDekM https://t.co/y4BcCSkuJ
@toadmeister You denialists did this trick before. 🙄 End point bias, selection bias with use of broken trends, no statistically significant change point shown, etc. https://t.co/UjZKzbjbVO https://t.co/pbrq1zT0Ra https://t.co/y4BcCSjWUb https://t.co/HHv
@balkraix @ClareCraigPath Also, what @ClareCraigPath peddled has been debunked for years. Global warming continued, with no statistically significant pause. It's telling that she relies on the Daily Mail, a source so bad that Wikipedia won't cite it. 🙄 h
@dodders75 @rahmstorf @CarbonBrief @ClimateFdbk @hausfath @metoffice It's not a peer-reviewed paper. It's an outdated document on an outdated analysis that under-estimated warming for a number of reasons, including poor coverage in the Arctic. Let me know
@dodders75 @rahmstorf @CarbonBrief @ClimateFdbk @hausfath No, it's correct. Change point analysis confirms there was no statistically significant pause. Your use of an unsourced image does nothing to change that. https://t.co/UjZKzbiE6g https://t.co/y4B
@ScienceSense1st @KelvinBSP @EcoSenseNow It's not my fault you're a bad person with no integrity nor any honest interest in evidence. Some people are just lost causes who, through their own choices, will never become better people. You just can't be helped
@ScienceSense1st @KelvinBSP @EcoSenseNow Re: "And yet the hiatus was acknowledged in peer reviewed literature" 🥱 https://t.co/UjZKzbiE6g https://t.co/ESmK2WpXJ8 https://t.co/4FSEKFQmpI
@ScienceSense1st @KelvinBSP @EcoSenseNow Re: "What about Dr.Judith Curry. She was a climate alarmist until she saw the fraud that was going on" You got a problem. "This is why i prefer the reanalyses, such as ERA5." https://t.co/Ajfx9fyYpA https://t.co/
@Moderna5G_666 @brandondaly2018 @ScienceSense1st @theresphysics @curryja @OregonState Re: "@sciencesense1st is really a sorry individual — blocked me after this single tweet of mine" They're just a typical denialist and paranoid conspiracy theorist. http
@ScienceSense1st @KelvinBSP @malta75616353 @EcoSenseNow Re: "There was a 20-year hiatus in global warming." No, there wasn't. Look up "change point analysis". https://t.co/XpXEUdUA0E https://t.co/y4BcCSjWUb https://t.co/WDL92FmQA4 https://t.co/ESmK2WpXJ8
@JR4_Truth @mwicDallas Re: "No, there's been a 64 month pause." Stop trolling. https://t.co/FoEP0Q30Ib https://t.co/DScMTh0acF https://t.co/yz3AL6DT7D https://t.co/23PHsaJlvU
@HarryMbike @VABVOX @hizam_elqahtani @Reuters This explains the specific flaws in the model used by Hansen et. all and why it's been conclusively discredited. https://t.co/5R4LOY5Ydn
@sullivan_larry @Anna98831 @EdWellham @EDavidAn @fagandr1 @Damo__73_ @SimonMonk @simonahac @mattjcan @EcoSenseNow Good luck with the "hiatus". https://t.co/H76jHTu58x
@SlugBub Re: "Tamino didn't do change point analysis on the Greenland ice loss" I know. That's not the published work of his I referred to: https://t.co/ssgPunWweo Re: "each loss rate statistically significant in that period" We've been over this: https
@patzo30 @SylviaD32911201 That first graph has no apparent source, the linked study, in its own words " Strengthening near-term emissions reductions would hedge against a high climate response", so doesn't agree with you. And the "pause" has been repeatedl
@MoFloMoJo @NelsonAlmUK @CarolineLucas @PhilipHammondUK @NASA Re: "I pointed out to him earlier you can't just cherry pick data points to fabricate a trend not manifested in the data and he clearly didn't understand what I meant." Oh, I think he understan
@HakanStenstrom @LarsSund1 @svtnyheter @sdriks Till att börjaj med det var ingen "paus" 1998-2014 "We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis" https://t.co/sofjQSMxon även länk i denna artikel
@JSegor Re: "I will tag papers dealing with this statistical phenomenon." Some more: https://t.co/XpXEUdUA0E https://t.co/y4BcCSjWUb https://t.co/HHv5fbIHIt https://t.co/ihz5qxHjMe pages 145 and 150: https://t.co/Cgyf8KTtZB https://t.co/ESmK2WpXJ8 https
Re: "recent surface warming" Examples of studies that show no "hiatus": https://t.co/WTLevxIP9U https://t.co/egujEgncAy https://t.co/wu6gzW8fLM https://t.co/avbcVNmeCf Section 4: https://t.co/noMBaZNjBg https://t.co/HoTXpDgXVT https://t.co/rkRtRwYllN ht
@insideclimate As a *statistically significant* event, it never happened. That's been shown in quite a few studies, even including the one you cite. https://t.co/WTLevxIP9U https://t.co/PoL0fNTw9a https://t.co/egujEgncAy https://t.co/cMwflKl8Wz https://t.
@pogi_miguel2 Do you need more time to understand why cherry-picking an anomalous El Nino year like 2016 as your start-point for a less than 3 year "trend" is even more egregious than cherry-picking the 1997/1998 El Nino as a start-point? https://t.co/egu
@FriendsOScience @KnudJahnke @geoffmprice @curryja @RyanMaue What are his thoughts after the numerous studies published after this interview? Here's a few: https://t.co/yR97ExQHDD https://t.co/9UfAKGjCo9 https://t.co/rrwkXZwpnJ https://t.co/0sPhVtJQPw http
@skylucsimard1 @EcoSenseNow @ClimateOfGavin Yes, no expertise. He has no publication record in this field (on sensitivity). Here's what some real experts have shown on this: https://t.co/ESmK2WpXJ8 https://t.co/dXhnhIe2FU https://t.co/PoL0fNTw9a https://t
@Curmudgeon1836 @PopSci @HouseScience @joemfbrown Here’s another Nature article on the “hiatus:” https://t.co/RqG7wSz66B And one from the journal Climatic Change: https://t.co/c1nSBIaXqA
@AndyOz2 the record.always showed warming, there was no pause https://t.co/Eipk98JfnH
RT @FabiusMaximus01: 2/ Neal reviews "Debunking the climate hiatus" by Bala Rajaratnam et al (all at Stamford), Climate Change, Nov 2015. h…
2/ Neal reviews "Debunking the climate hiatus" by Bala Rajaratnam et al (all at Stamford), Climate Change, Nov 2015. https://t.co/xBU6EjW10W
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
#Climate: “@drvox: warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/t2iNgFbBkL bogus: https://t.co/Naaukknh2Y bogus: https://t.co/nTlQPfNip3”
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
Por si alguien se lo había creido https://t.co/cLwgU1HPly
Debunking the climate hiatus https://t.co/B680ZM1tqP #climatechange
@Martin_Kinnunen @LorentzTovatt @ErikaKarl "hiatusen" är enligt flera nya studier inte statistiskt signifikant. http://t.co/8EFlsCHff4
Debunking the climate hiatus http://t.co/Dpfu2w4qVo
RT @greenforyou: Debunking the climate hiatus #green http://t.co/IZ4b9wYcJf
@ImaBannedd @tan123 @ronalan908 @TenneyNaumer @rahmstorf cherry-pick science? I rely on peer-review http://t.co/EjX7HJb3Qo
@LeoHickman @MichaelEMann The global warming 'hiatus' never happened. http://t.co/XLSkEjJ3rL
RT @tcktcktck: global warming ‘hiatus’ never happened, scientists say. Read the full report here http://t.co/VuUDeTlb4A via @EcoWatch
global warming ‘hiatus’ never happened, scientists say. Read the full report here http://t.co/VuUDeTlb4A via @EcoWatch
Debunking the climate hiatus スタンフォード大学のグループからの報告がつい最近でたらしい。どうなんでしょうか。 http://t.co/MFQBr5c8Yj
RT @ClimateOpp: Latest from Climatic Change:"analysis reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean temperature"http:/…
@MrOoijer Sorry, indeed confusing. Lewandowsky ea: http://t.co/PRuUuKry7a. This was the one criticized by Tamino: http://t.co/hfyxBlgInN
I'm reading "The so called warming hiatus was all bollocks" #paraphrased #paper #climate http://t.co/nLEZIU3wxI #springerlink
RT @KiryeNet: 【概要2】いずれにしても、 合意することが、どうしても出来ないようです。 地球温暖化のハイエイタスは基本的に、 地表面温度のデータの偶然で、実際は存在しなかったとする 今年前半の連邦政府の研究者からの主張を http://t.co/sTzminY…
Debunking the #climate hiatus http://t.co/uRthklDfnx #springerlink #science
【概要2】いずれにしても、 合意することが、どうしても出来ないようです。 地球温暖化のハイエイタスは基本的に、 地表面温度のデータの偶然で、実際は存在しなかったとする 今年前半の連邦政府の研究者からの主張を http://t.co/sTzminYq4J
Interessante leitura, a estatística derrubando mais um conceito que vinha sendo formado: I'm reading http://t.co/EjWPHO8rNe #springerlink
New Paper: Debunking the climate hiatus (Springer Open Access) Authors:Bala Rajaratnam , Joseph Romano, Michael... http://t.co/T4JWYMymgB
"We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a 'hiatus' in global warming lack sound scientific basis." http://t.co/fROBBvtkJE