RT @KhannaAshishCCM: @PharmacyToDose @mtbastin @KatSpazPharmD @UKCritCarePharm One of my favorite trials! And also one of my favorite edito…
@PharmacyToDose @mtbastin @KatSpazPharmD @UKCritCarePharm One of my favorite trials! And also one of my favorite editorials from Pierre Asfar : https://t.co/r78xa2l1WG
#Tracheostomy emergencies: another @OnePagerICU favorite: https://t.co/6O7COPJ1ze #MAP goal of 65? Why? https://t.co/PoJZa3GmZh https://t.co/dvuiSO6kzK https://t.co/sdYkaosbAM Should we individualize our MAP goals? https://t.co/ee7terji5G https://t.co/6Vw
@ogi_gajic Counter - counter argument #1 one size fits all MAP target of 65 may be invalid # 2 flow rather than pressors may be necessary for organ perfusion and outcomes https://t.co/aK2uPMip04 and https://t.co/DDziXl3aPZ
ICU領域では平均動脈圧≧65mmHg以上での管理を推奨している事が多い歴史的理由や近年のエビデンスについて触れています。 無料で見れるのにとても勉強になる文献 https://t.co/7xN2RyYkFY
集中治療室での早期リハビリテーションの開始基準にMAP≧65mmHgがあります。 MAP目標値≧65mmHgは、主に敗血症性ショック患者の管理の最初の24時間 or 48時間の間に、MAPの異なる閾値以下で過ごした時間を調査した2つのレトロスペクティブ研究の結果に基づいていると。 https://t.co/7xN2RyYkFY
@iceman_ex @mowtownphilippe @dr_supradip @Wilkinsonjonny @siddharth_dugar @aroradrn @JoshFessel @BrowofJustice @msiuba @msenussiMD @PittIMPOCUS @LMSaxhaug @avkwong Aren’t we going to the other direction though? Permissive hypotension works for traumas and
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @gsmartinmd: Optimal MAP target in #sepsis and #SepticShock? 65 looks pretty good but we really need (1) a study, and (2) individualized…
RT @gsmartinmd: Optimal MAP target in #sepsis and #SepticShock? 65 looks pretty good but we really need (1) a study, and (2) individualized…
RT @gsmartinmd: Optimal MAP target in #sepsis and #SepticShock? 65 looks pretty good but we really need (1) a study, and (2) individualized…
RT @gsmartinmd: Optimal MAP target in #sepsis and #SepticShock? 65 looks pretty good but we really need (1) a study, and (2) individualized…
Optimal MAP target in #sepsis and #SepticShock? 65 looks pretty good but we really need (1) a study, and (2) individualized targets that consider organ persuasion (cerebral, kidney, etc) https://t.co/bRAAydvRR8
RT @KhannaAshishCCF: @KunalKaramchan2 This is the pilot for SEPSISPAM - the control group was unpowered for mortality. Also myocardial inju…
@KunalKaramchan2 This is the pilot for SEPSISPAM - the control group was unpowered for mortality. Also myocardial injury was not assessed. This editorial is a great assessment - https://t.co/hlAuPigkG2
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
A MAP of 65mmHg is now an open-question in the ICU. Still reaching for that “magic number” https://t.co/hlAuPigkG2
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @CAmarelli74: Having followed in ICU more than 500 Heart Transplants the knowledge of MPP as the main hemodynamic goal is quite well est…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @CAmarelli74: Having followed in ICU more than 500 Heart Transplants the knowledge of MPP as the main hemodynamic goal is quite well est…
Very relevant to our Summer Lecture Series talk on sepsis last week! https://t.co/inshNiKEoN
Having followed in ICU more than 500 Heart Transplants the knowledge of MPP as the main hemodynamic goal is quite well established when the right ventricular function is flawed from disease, dysfunction or aggressive ventilation. https://t.co/g65Disn9Tc
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
RT @ECMOprincess: Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e.,…
Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) may serve as a better surrogate marker of perfusion pressure than MAP.(MAP) and CVP, i.e., MPP = MAP − CVP [10, 11]. Whether MPP is a better resuscitation target for patients with shock is unknown. https://t.co/ji7HThjEQA
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
RT @ATSfellows: Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evi…
Why do we use a MAP>65mmHg for sepsis? Is it the best target? Link: https://t.co/VxDowbqBju Editorial reviews current evidence “any potential beneficial effect of raising the MAP target should be balanced with potentially undesired side effects from
MAP of 65: target of the past? https://t.co/G5rJ6Emmeb #IntCareMed