↓ Skip to main content

Stories of impact: the role of narrative in understanding the value and impact of digital collections

Overview of attention for article published in Archival Science, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 148)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Stories of impact: the role of narrative in understanding the value and impact of digital collections
Published in
Archival Science, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10502-015-9253-5
Authors

Diana E. Marsh, Ricardo L. Punzalan, Robert Leopold, Brian Butler, Massimo Petrozzi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Librarian 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Unspecified 6 11%
Other 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 18 34%
Social Sciences 14 26%
Unspecified 6 11%
Computer Science 6 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#960,355
of 13,190,641 outputs
Outputs from Archival Science
#14
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,565
of 239,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archival Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,190,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them